Let’s say the cost of a compliance program costs $12,000 annually. Does it cost a lot?
It depends on what you’re replacing.
If automation eliminates hundreds of hours of repetitive evidence collection in a tangled technology landscape, $12,000 could be money well spent. If a company of seven could manually gather similar evidence in just the space of a few hours every month, the amount is quite different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Do not begin by asking what platform comes with the most features. Consider how much time and effort these features will save your company.
The Break-Even Level for Automation
Automating compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. The importance of automation for compliance is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a technology company which is growing, several cloud environments, a variety of applications, and constant changes to access. The effort of manually capturing evidence on a regular basis could be very heavy. Integrations that automate monitoring systems and collect evidence easily justify the cost.
Consider a startup with 10 employees working on their first SOC 2. The infrastructure could be compact, and evidence collection could remain manageable without massive automation.
This distinction is crucial when evaluating Vanta’s pricing. A well-designed platform may offer significant capabilities, however those capabilities are only beneficial when the company actually needs the capabilities.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Finding Vanta and Drata quickly becomes a feature-by -feature exercise. Both are well-established solutions for compliance based on automation and integrations. Therefore, they can be compared in terms of supported frameworks as well as integrations, service contracts, and individual quotes are useful for businesses who are looking for a similar approach.
But there’s still another decision you’ll need to make. Does your business have an interest in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Certain companies want automated evidence collection and constant monitoring. Others would rather provide evidence themselves, particularly when the work load is not too heavy.
Vanta Competitors Do not all follow the same model
A number of well-known Vanta rivals have a place in the market, with a similar focus on automation. There are also smaller platforms based on management rather than comprehensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of the latter category. It was developed by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central workspace, gives editable policies as well as evidence-based guidance. It also lets auditors review submitted evidence with the use of read-only access.
It does not connect to operational systems or create infrastructure agents. Customers upload their own evidence.
The system access should be considered. the access to the system.
Removal of integrations comes with an obvious drawback: you have to gather evidence manually.
This removes the requirement for integration, and the use of compliance does not require an interface to the operating environment.
The design and architecture of one is not superior to the other. The question is which best choice is appropriate for your organization.
CertAssist is a solution for teams with between five and 200 participants. Its pricing is published rather than having to make a sales call to get the initial figure. The price stated for the launch of CertAssist is $225 per monthly in comparison to a regular $375.
Let Complexity Find Its Proper Place
The needs of a 10-person start-up today might not necessarily match its requirements at 100 or 500 employees.
A light platform may make sense if compliance remains easy. As the number of employees, systems, frameworks, and evidence requirements expand, the economics may eventually favor greater automation. It’s better to let the complexity of technology for compliance to earn its rightful place.
Don’t pay for fifty different integrations just because they look impressive in the comparison chart. They’re worth it as the work they replace is more expensive as compared to manually performing them.